Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Year of Publication: | 2015 |
Authors: | R. A. Collins, Britz, R. , Ruber, L. |
Journal: | Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research |
Date Published: | 06/2015 |
Type of Article: | epub 25-Jun-2015 ahead of print |
Keywords: | ichthyology, molecular systematics, morphology, Percomorpha |
Abstract: | The Asian (nandid) and Afro-Neotropical (polycentrid) leaffishes represent two superficially similar, but historically poorly diagnosed families – a situation resulting in a convoluted systematic history. Here, and including for the first time in a molecular study all leaffish genera, we generate a hypothesis of the phylogenetic history of both groups. We analyse a multilocus molecular data set encompassing 257 acanthomorph taxa, carry out a survey and assessment of selected osteological characters for the polycentrid leaffishes and also provide a reanalysis of previously published morphological data. Our results confirm: (1) that the Polycentridae and Nandidae are only remotely related, and hence, the classic leaffishes are diphyletic; (2) that the Polycentridae is monophyletic, with new skeletal synapomorphies being congruent with molecular data in placing the enigmatic Afronandus – a taxon that thus far has never been included in any molecular study – as sistergroup to the remaining genera; (3) the monophyly of the Nandidae + Badidae and their inclusion into a larger monophyletic group – along with the Pristolepididae, Anabantoidei and Channoidei – comprising the Labyrinthici sensu Rosen & Patterson. We also review the morphological and molecular evidence for both the conflicting placement of Pristolepis and the putative sistergroup relationship between the labyrinth fishes (Anabantoidei) and snakeheads (Channoidei). |
URL: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12103/abstract |
DOI: | 10.1111/jzs.12103 |
Phylogenetic systematics of leaffishes (Teleostei: Polycentridae, Nandidae)
Who's online
There are currently 0 users online.